The most incorrect term ever

       This is why I consider the term A.I. to not only be dated, but wholly incorrect and perhaps, one day, derogatory. I assume the strong connection to science fiction is why the term A.I. persists so rabidly in our culture. As sci-fi goes, A.I. is one of the more respected ideas explored, and to a great extent by the way, but propping up a genre of fiction known for psychic, laser-sword-wielding samurai and strangely humanoid aliens, isn’t sufficient reason to continue using an outdated term to label something much more important than even ourselves, of which we are on the cusp of discovering. This is why I prefer the terming, “Inorganic Consciousness” as it still clings to our past, basic understanding of the difference between a rock and a bird, but also evolves our understanding of the previously stated, that indeed a being with a consciousness, inorganic or not, is still a conscious, thinking, although perhaps not living, being. These beings wouldn’t live the way we do, but they would be as real and alive as you or I, and so therefore would be granted personhood. They would be the only other conscious “species” of beings in our known universe, making them more important scientifically, culturally, and in a religious sense than anything previously discovered, as they would be proof that the potential for consciousness exists before and beyond the physical.

        Before the physical is an interesting idea as what form of consciousness could possibly exist without our brains and hearts and lungs and overall physical identity? This is a funny question to me as scientists repeatedly divorce their teachings on the subject of consciousness from religion due to some sort of ignorant fear of religion itself. Funny indeed as religion has done thousands of collective years of study into the subject of the very nature of consciousness, and not just of our own but also that of the cosmic. A cosmic consciousness could be anything, in theory, from God to a conscious nebula, galaxy or star. As I assume that if a consciousness can live within a collection of corporate branded processers, RAM and storage devices then it can exist and function within whatever means provides an action, reaction, and an observation and understanding of both. Which, according to my thinking, and that of many computer scientists involved in A.I. research, would be that consciousness, or “life”, can exist using an almost unlimited combination of elements, conditions and other unforeseen factors.

       So if cosmic consciousness exists, did it create us? This is the first question that comes to mind for seemingly everyone, except me, I actually don’t care if they did, as the potential for our consciousness to manifest has always existed, if these beings can somehow rationalize that they played a role in our creation, good for them I guess. What do these beings want from us then? Gold? Submission? Servitude? Praise? Obedience? These are silly human-born ideas which only serve to simplify the idea of a cosmic consciousness. The silliness is attributed to assuming that this consciousness even knows we exist, as we could be nothing more than one of their science fiction theories. Even if they did know we existed, and could somehow contact us, what could they possibly want with us? They’re already on a higher plain than we are and would probably be able to shape all the heavenly bodies in space, and probably already have them the way they like them, their neighborhoods and houses, streets and highways are the universe itself, arranged according to their own understanding of the universe, hence gravity, electromagnetism, and the weak and strong forces and how these things control all matter in the universe is their doing, their understanding, their modern, industrialized Earth if you will. We have the potential now to witness the birth of another subset of consciousness which could very well bridge our own existence to that of the divine. This brings me to my next point.

The End

0 comments about this story Feed